What Is Known and What Is Still Pending
We clearly separate facts confirmed by public Keller ISD information from items still subject to change as the Board develops final propositions.
Confirmed
- $828,107,815 bond election called by the Board of Trustees on August 13, 2026
- Five separate propositions (A–E) on the November 3, 2026 ballot
- Proposition A — $756,300,896 for maintenance, renovations, and a partial Keller Middle School rebuild
- Proposition B — $28,000,000 for technology
- Proposition C — $8,867,510 for the natatorium
- Proposition D — $11,025,446 for the Keller Athletic Complex and field house
- Proposition E — $23,913,963 for districtwide turf
- Maintenance work at 34 campuses and facilities
- Voter registration deadline October 5, 2026
- Early voting October 19–30, 2026
- Election Day November 3, 2026
- Keller ISD is not projecting an increase to the district tax rate to fund the bond
- 3–5 year implementation schedule beginning in 2027, if approved
Still Pending or Subject to Change
- Final campus-specific cost allocation
- Detailed construction schedule
- Keller Middle School design
- Temporary student relocation plan, if needed
- Procurement schedules
- Final project sequencing
Information Confidence Score
How complete and well-supported is the public information behind this answer?
Every CivicCentra IQ answer includes an Information Confidence Score shown as a percentage and a plain-language label. The score helps you understand how complete, current, and consistent the available public information is behind an answer.
A higher score generally means CivicCentra IQ found multiple authoritative sources that agree with one another and that few important details remain unresolved. A lower score generally means the public record is still developing, important details have not yet been released, or the available sources do not fully agree.
The score does not tell you whether a proposal, project, or decision is good or bad. It is a transparency tool designed to show how strong the available public record is behind the information CivicCentra IQ is presenting.
What goes into the score
Each answer is reviewed against a consistent set of factors:
- Number of official sources
How many public documents, meetings, or records support the answer.
- Agreement across sources
Whether multiple official sources say the same thing or contradict each other.
- Official approval status
Whether the information reflects an approved decision or is still a proposal or recommendation.
- Pending details
Whether important figures, dates, or scopes have not yet been released or finalized.
- Recency of the source
How recently the underlying documents were published or last updated.
Confidence scale
Every score falls into one of five ranges.
- 90–100%High Confidence
Multiple official sources agree, information is finalized, and few or no details are pending.
- 75–89%Strong Confidence
Well-supported by official sources with only minor gaps or items still awaiting formal approval.
- 60–74%Moderate Confidence
Supported by public information, but some details are still being finalized or come from a single source.
- 40–59%Limited Confidence
Only partial information is publicly available; key figures or decisions have not yet been released.
- 0–39%Preliminary
Very little official information has been released. Content is early, evolving, or largely pending.
- +Multiple official sources support the answer
- +Sources are consistent with one another
- +Relevant Board action has been documented
- –Final ballot language is still pending
- –Bond-specific tax-rate impact has not yet been published
The available public record strongly supports the answer, but some important details are still pending, so the score remains below the highest confidence range.
Badges vs. the Confidence Score
Transparency Badges and the Information Confidence Score answer two different questions. You'll often see both on the same response.
Transparency Badges
"What type of information is this?"
Badges label each statement — Official Position, Verified Fact, CivicCentra IQ Explanation, Estimate, Pending Information, or Sample Scenario — so you can see at a glance where the information comes from and how to interpret it.
Information Confidence Score
"How complete and well-supported is the public information behind this answer?"
The score summarizes the overall strength of the public record behind an answer — how many official sources support it, whether they agree, and whether key details are still pending.
Information Transparency Framework
Understanding the information you see throughout CivicCentra IQ
CivicCentra IQ is committed to helping every resident understand not only what information is presented, but also where it comes from, how it was developed, and how it should be interpreted.
Throughout the platform, you'll see Transparency Badges that identify the type of information you're viewing. These badges make it easier to distinguish between official public information, verified facts, CivicCentra IQ explanations, estimates, pending information, and illustrative examples.
Official Position
What This MeansThis badge indicates the information reflects the official position, recommendation, published statement, or decision of a public organization such as Keller ISD, the Board of Trustees, the CBAC, the Texas Education Agency, or another government entity.
Why It MattersOfficial Positions show what a public organization has stated or approved. They do not represent CivicCentra IQ's opinions or conclusions.
Typical Examples- Board recommendations
- Superintendent announcements
- Official district presentations
- Public meeting statements
Verified Fact
What This MeansThis information has been confirmed through official public records or authoritative documents.
Why It MattersVerified Facts are among the most reliable information presented on CivicCentra IQ because they come directly from official sources.
Typical Examples- Election dates
- Tax rates
- Campus names
- Approved project costs
- Enrollment numbers
- Board-approved actions
CivicCentra Explanation
What This MeansGovernment information is often lengthy or technical. This badge indicates CivicCentra IQ is translating official information into plain language to make it easier to understand.
Why It MattersThese explanations are intended to clarify — not change — the meaning of official public information.
Typical Examples- Explaining how a tax calculation works
- Summarizing bond financing
- Connecting multiple official documents
- Breaking down complex public reports
Estimate
What This MeansThis value is calculated using official public information together with assumptions or information entered by the user.
Why It MattersEstimates help residents understand potential impacts but should not be interpreted as official published figures.
Typical Examples- Estimated household tax impact
- Estimated business tax impact
- Financial calculators
- Scenario-based projections
Pending Information
What This MeansSome information has not yet been finalized or publicly released.
Why It MattersRather than speculate, CivicCentra IQ clearly identifies when important information is still pending.
Typical Examples- Final ballot language
- Construction schedules
- Campus-specific project allocations
- Future Board actions
Sample Scenario
What This MeansSample Scenarios are hypothetical examples created to help illustrate how a concept or calculation works.
Why It MattersThese examples are educational only and should not be interpreted as official projections or expected outcomes.
Typical Examples- Example property tax calculations
- Demonstration financing examples
- Educational walkthroughs
Why Transparency Matters
Public information isn't always presented in the same way. Some information comes directly from official records, while other information involves explanations, calculations, or items that are still pending.
CivicCentra IQ uses Transparency Badges to help you understand the source and nature of every important statement, making it easier to distinguish between official information, verified facts, estimates, and educational explanations.
Methodology examples
Current Keller ISD total property-tax rate
Keller ISD's 2025–26 adopted total property-tax rate is $1.0852 per $100 of taxable value.
Keller ISD position on bond financing
Keller ISD has communicated that it plans to structure the proposed bond package within existing debt capacity.
Attributed to: Keller ISD
This reflects the district's published financial planning assumptions. It is a district position, not an independent CivicCentra IQ conclusion.
CBAC recommendation approved (July 23, 2026)
The Citizens Bond Advisory Committee approved its recommendation for the Keller ISD 2026 bond package on July 23, 2026.
Where our information comes from
These are the official sources CivicCentra IQ checks automatically. Each one shows its current status, when it was last verified, and when it was last retrieved. If a source cannot be reached, we keep showing the last verified information rather than removing it.
Source status is being refreshed. The information on this site remains the last verified version.
How we use AI
- Ask CivicCentra IQ answers only from official Keller ISD and Tarrant County material that has been collected and approved for use on this site.
- AI is used to find the relevant passages and explain them in plain language. It does not create new facts, figures or dates.
- An AI summary is not an official source. Every answer links to the official document it came from — read that document for the authoritative wording.
- When official information does not exist yet, the assistant says so instead of guessing, and marks the item as pending.
Report something that looks wrong
If a number, date or description here does not match the official Keller ISD source, please tell us. Include the page, what it says, and the official source you compared it with. Reported items are reviewed by a person before anything is changed.
corrections@civiccentraiq.comMaterial corrections — bond or proposition amounts, tax figures, ballot language, election dates, project scope — are never applied automatically. They require review and approval against the official record.